Four Options to Consider When Your Content is Plagiarized

This is a sample post from my Field Guide to Social Marketing.

I was reading up on DotNetKicks when I came across the most interesting headline I have ever seen on the site, “How YOUR tech blog posts are RIPPED OFF while you sleep!

The post comes from Mike Duncan, a C# blogger, who discovered that a piece of his hard work was more or less stolen by InfoQ (rel=no follow; no PageRank+1 for you,) a developer-oriented news site.

To give you a quick summary of what the issue is in this instance:

TWO DAYS after my post[, "SQLite on .NET - Get up and Running in 3 Minutes"] was out in the wild, I started seeing some interesting inbound links coming in from InfoQ, a tech news – paid story aggregator type site. While not somewhere I go often, their site is indeed large, thriving, and as it turns out, morally bankrupt. It seems that one Robert Bazinet has a story on the front page of the 250,000 unique visitors per month, page rank 7, mega-site that is InfoQ.com cleverly titled “Up and Running with SQLite on .NET in 3 Minutes.”

So what do you do if you’re Mike Duncan? Someone else is profiting from your own content and you’re not getting adequate credit or compensation?

There are four options:

  • Do Nothing
  • Do Little
  • Send in the Lawyers
  • Raise Hell

Option 1 – Don’t Do Anything

If your content has been totally stolen, 100% stolen with 0% credit given to you in any way, shape, or form then please don’t bother reading this; you need to get SOME credit before you even consider doing this. However, in the case of Mike Duncan, he did get a link back, some referral traffic, and a little bit of name recognition, even though he still wasn’t given the appropriate amount of credit.

Are you happy seeing your words get out there, regardless of whom they are attributed to? Enjoying some of the minor referral traffic? Then don’t do anything.

Option 2 – Do Little

Flowchart - Do Little Handling Process

Pretty self-explanatory. Do it yourself and contact the author and ask that they respect your original work and give you the proper level of credit.

Option 3 – Send in the Lawyers

Sending in the lawyers simply isn’t an option for most bloggers or small organizations.

Here’s a quick decision tree which will help you decide whether or not it’s worth calling up some intellectual property lawyers:

Decision Tree - Get the Lawyers Handling

This decision tree may be a little hard to read so I’ve included a full-sized version of this image here. Basically if the costs of pursuing legal actions are greater than the benefits, don’t do it.

Another thing to consider, though, is will legal action nip plagiarism from your site in the bud entirely or does it do nothing to prevent it from happening again in the future?

Option 4 – Raise Hell

This is the option I recommend for content owners who have already tried the “Do Little” option and don’t have the means to pursue the “Send in the Lawyers” option.

The objective of this option is to create enough noise and ill will towards the plagiarizer that the cost of not responding becomes greater than the value created by plagiarizing your content.

That being said, here are a few ways that you can go about “raising hell” when someone steals your content:

Mindmap - Raise Hell Option Ideas

Again, this Mind Map is probably pretty hard to read, thus I’ve attached a full-sized version of the image here.

Does this “raise hell” option seem a little immature, pedantic perhaps? Yes, but it’s effective.

Technorati Tags: ,

[Post to Twitter] 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Comments 4

  1. Guillaume Theoret wrote:

    The “badger the plagiarizer” option was hilarious =)

    Luckily for the tech plagiarizers most bloggers aren’t as persistent/insane as the somethingawful types or the badgering would get pretty intense.

    Posted 24 Mar 2008 at 9:08 pm
  2. Jonathan Bailey wrote:

    There is a critical fifth option that sits somewhere between “Do Little” and “Send in the Lawyers”, it would be “Secure Takedown” and would involve using the DMCA to secure either removal of the work from the host or from the search engines.

    The process is very simple, does not require a lawyer and can be done in about ten minutes when you get the hang of it and have a good stock letter.

    Honestly, it most cases, especially involving spam blogging, it is the best approach.

    On that note. the final option could play into the hands of scrapers and thieves considering they love attention, any attention.

    Hope this helps and thank you for drawing attention to this issue!

    Posted 24 Mar 2008 at 10:21 pm
  3. Aaronontheweb wrote:

    @Guillaume,

    Somewhere, back when I was a misled youth, I participated in a SomethingAwful.com raid on Ebaum’s World for stealing copy righted SA material. That was my first dip into the pool of “flexible fair use.”

    A lot of really shitty authors hide behind fair use as though it’s a cover-all for what is essentially complete and utter theft. Fair Use != stealing images and overwriting someone’s water mark with your own.

    @Jonathan,

    I tried to cover your point somewhere in the raise hell option (C&D for Cease & Desist) but I don’t know as much as you do on the subject. I looked over your list of DMCA contacts and I was really impressed at the lengths you probably had to go through to acquire all of that information.

    I’m going to try to get in touch with you for a bit more information about leveraging DMCA to protect content; it would be a handy addition to my Field Guide for Social Marketing. I’m doing business travel all day tomorrow and Wednesday but I’ll try to shoot you an email between now and then!

    Posted 25 Mar 2008 at 3:46 am
  4. Jonathan Bailey wrote:

    Aaron: Feel free to shoot me an email any time you wish. I’ll be leaving town Thursday night to head to Dallas and WordCamp but I should be checking email the whole time.

    Just drop me a line any time you’re available and I’ll help out any way I can.

    And the DMCA contact information was a pain to create but I was fortunate in that I had amassed about half of it before I started. I’d created a personal rolodex of sorts before I decided to make it public…

    It’s a cheat, but it worked.

    Posted 25 Mar 2008 at 6:52 pm

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 1

  1. From bizsugar.com on 26 Mar 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Four Options to Consider When Your Content is Plagiarized | Marketing Ninja

    From the Page: “So what do you do if someone else is profiting from your own content and you’re not getting adequate credit or compensation?

    There are four options:”

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *