In my previous post I speculated as to whether or not most customers would prefer to be sold on a product through a blog or a static office document, like a PDF or a Microsoft Word document.
We’ve executed some email campaigns over the past month to test this theory. Here are the details that I can discuss:
- Our sample size was significant (I won’t say how large exactly so don’t ask;)
- We conducted four trials with the same audience;
- Each trial had its own unique subject and content;
- We sent the email at regularly scheduled intervals;
- We used a blog entry and a PDF alternative;
- The blog and the PDFs that we used contained the same information but with two different presentation philosophies, like the ones I outlined in my earlier post.
Given all this, here are the results:
These numbers are all click through rates (CTR) of people who opened the emails sent during each one of our trials.
| Trial # | % CTR to PDF | % CTR to Blog |
| 1 | 18.13% | 8.00% |
| 2 | 22.61% | 3.92% |
| 3 | 22.90% | 2.12% |
| 4 | 28.57% | 2.02% |
I haven’t provided enough information about our audience to make this test an official scientific marketing study for the general public; think of these findings as a weathervane indicator – this test only tells you what direction the wind is blowing, not it’s magnitude.
I performed another calculation which resulted in the headline for this article; here’s the formula:
AVERAGE(PDF CTR)/AVERAGE(Blog CTR) = 8.31
This means that for every person who clicked through to the blog first roughly 8 people preferred to click through to a PDF document with the same information on average.
What are the implications of this finding?
- It tells me that the people on this mailing list are not comfortable with the concept of a “blog” as an information delivery mechanism.
- It tells me that given the choice between an online blog and a PDF download, many customers feel more comfortable with a PDF or other static document.
- It tells me that perhaps marketers like me, who recognize the obvious advantages of blogs as an information distribution mechanism, need to find ways to make blogs more appealing to older, more affluent audiences in general.
If you’d like to discuss this in more detail with me feel free to hit me up with questions on Twitter or on the comments here. I won’t be able to disclose many of the details but I might be able to answer other questions.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Comments 2
Couple questions:
1. What were the headlines/titles of the “documents”?
2. What was your specific “Call to Action”? Example, visit our blog for full details. You’ll find the White Paper download here.
As I stated earlier, my experience, all though not fully tested, is b-t-b doesn’t trust the word “blog”…
So, don’t call it a blog.
Now, if all things equal here, my question is “Why?”
Posted 05 Jun 2008 at 6:16 pm ¶Hey Walt, thanks again for commenting.
1. I can’t disclose the headlines.
2. Calls to action were:
“read more on our blog” or “download our PDF on [subject of the email]
I think you’re right about not referring to our blog as a “blog.” We’re also considering experimenting with not giving our audience a choice of where to go at all; the new call to action would be “click here to read more” or something along those lines.
Posted 05 Jun 2008 at 9:30 pm ¶Trackbacks & Pingbacks 2
Customers Pick Static Documents over Blog Entries 8 to 1 on Average | Marketing Ninja
Given the choice between an online blog and a PDF download, many customers feel more comfortable with a PDF or other static document.
[...] audience, but some people don’t get it yet. Maybe a lot of people don’t get it yet. Marketing Ninja also has a relevant anecdote showing a situation where people preferred static documents (e.g. Adobe .PDF files) over blog posts [...]
Post a Comment